Explore Loria product information and Fasolati’s development directions. Ask about current product details or request updates on the work ahead. These pages are inquiry paths, not checkout or enrollment.
Daily oral care within the Fasolati vision.
Request current product details, labeling and purchasing information for Loria. Product-specific evidence should guide any use; the wider oral-systemic research program is not a claim of benefit from this rinse.
Ask about the current formulation, labeling and directions.
Contact us for current ordering information.
Ask for evidence specific to the finished formulation and intended use.
An enzyme-and-phage approach to oral biofilm, in development.
Lytica is a development concept exploring a staged enzyme-and-phage approach to oral biofilm. Formulation, delivery, safety, clinical benefit and intended use still require evaluation. This is not a treatment protocol.
Evaluate biofilm intervention as a defined, testable formulation.
Establish safety, performance, appropriate evidence and intended-use requirements.
A gut-health research direction, not a barrier-restoration promise.
The Gut Stack explores which nutrition or microbiome interventions merit testing alongside oral and independently measured host-response channels. Components, dosing and benefits remain to be established; this is not a personalized regimen or a validated gut-integrity score.
When does a gut-focused intervention add meaningful benefit?
Define the intervention, comparator and outcome before assigning a benefit.
What changed? How confident are we? What next step is justified?
The Life Board is the proposed front end of the Fasolati Engine. It is being developed to keep measurements, uncertainty and supporting evidence inspectable, with oral, gut and systemic observations shown separately. It is not a live clinical service, an autonomous prescriber or one averaged health score.
Show the measured result, specimen, date and comparison—not an inferred organ score.
Show measurement quality, variation and missing evidence; allow “not interpretable yet.”
Explain what the evidence supports, including when professional review is appropriate.